Jesus Was Born of a Virgin

Conventionalities that Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit

The virgin nascency of Jesus is the Christian doctrine that Jesus was conceived by his mother, Mary, through the power of the Holy Spirit and without sexual intercourse.^[1] It is mentioned only in Matthew i:18-25 and Luke 1:26-38,^[2] and the modern scholarly consensus is that the narrative rests on very slender historical foundations.^[3] Christians traditionally regard it every bit an explanation of the mixture of the man and divine natures of Jesus.^[iv] ^[1] Even so, today there are many churches in which it is considered orthodox to accept the virgin nascency but not heretical to deny information technology.^[five]

New Testament narratives: Matthew and Luke [edit]

Matthew 1:18-25 [edit]

18: Now the nativity of Jesus the Messiah took place in this way. When his female parent Mary had been engaged to Joseph, merely before they lived together, she was found to be with child from the Holy Spirit.
19: Her husband Joseph, existence a righteous human being and unwilling to expose her to public disgrace, planned to dismiss her quietly.
20: Merely but when he had resolved to exercise this, an angel of the Lord appeared to him in a dream and said, "Joseph, son of David, do not exist afraid to have Mary as your wife, for the kid conceived in her is from the Holy Spirit.
21: She will acquit a son, and y'all are to name him Jesus, for he will save his people from their sins."
22: All this took place to fulfil what had been spoken past the Lord through the prophet:
23: "Look, the virgin shall excogitate and behave a son, and they shall proper noun him Emmanuel," which means, "God is with us."
24: When Joseph awoke from slumber, he did every bit the angel of the Lord commanded him; he took her equally his married woman,
25: but had no marital relations with her until she had borne a son; and he named him Jesus.

Luke 1:26-38 [edit]

26: In the 6th calendar month the angel Gabriel was sent past God to a town in Galilee called Nazareth,
27: to a virgin engaged to a man whose proper name was Joseph, of the house of David. The virgin'south proper noun was Mary.
28: And he came to her and said, "Greetings, favored one! The Lord is with y'all."
29: Simply she was much perplexed by his words and pondered what sort of greeting this might be.
30: The angel said to her, "Exercise not be afraid, Mary, for you have establish favor with God.
31: And now, you will excogitate in your womb and acquit a son, and y'all will proper noun him Jesus.
32: He will be swell, and will be called the Son of the Most High, and the Lord God will give to him the throne of his antecedent David.
33: He will reign over the firm of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will exist no terminate."
34: Mary said to the angel, "How can this be, since I am a virgin?"
35: The angel said to her, "The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Virtually High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be built-in will exist holy; he will be called Son of God.
36: And now, your relative Elizabeth in her old age has also conceived a son; and this is the 6th month for her who was said to exist barren.
37: For nothing volition exist impossible with God."
38: Then Mary said, "Here am I, the servant of the Lord; allow it exist with me according to your give-and-take." And then the angel departed from her.

Texts [edit]

In the entire Christian corpus, the virgin birth is explicit only in the Gospel of Matthew and the Gospel of Luke.^[two] The two hold that Mary'southward husband was named Joseph, that he was of the Davidic line, and that he played no role in Jesus's divine conception, but beyond this they are very different.^[6] ^[vii] Matthew has no census, shepherds, or presentation in the temple, and implies that Joseph and Mary are living in Bethlehem at the fourth dimension of the birth, while Luke has no magi, flying into Egypt or massacre of the infants, and states that Joseph lives in Nazareth.^{[half dozen]}

Matthew underlines the virginity of Mary by references to the Volume of Isaiah (using the Greek translation in the Septuagint, rather than the more often than not Hebrew Masoretic Text) and by his narrative statement that Joseph had no sexual relations with her until later on the birth (a choice of words which leaves open the possibility that they did have relations after that).^[eight] Luke introduces Mary equally a virgin, describes her puzzlement at being told she will bear a child despite her lack of sexual experience, and informs the reader that this pregnancy is to be effected through God'due south Holy Spirit.^[nine] The account has obvious problems: why would Mary, betrothed and about to begin life with her husband, be puzzled at the idea that she will accept a child, particularly as there is goose egg in the angel's words ("you will conceive in your womb and bear a son") to suggest that the child'due south formulation volition exist other than natural.

There is a serious debate equally to whether Luke'due south birth story is an original part of his gospel.^[10] Capacity i and 2 are written in a style quite different from the rest of the gospel, and the dependence of the nascence narrative on the Greek Septuagint is absent from the remainder.^[11] There are strong Lukan motifs in Luke 1–2, simply differences are equally striking—Jesus's identity equally "son of David", for case, is a prominent theme of the nativity narrative, but not in the rest of the gospel.^[12] In the early part of the 2nd century the gnostic theologian Marcion produced a version of Luke lacking these two capacity, and although he is more often than not accused of having cut them out of a longer text more than similar our ain, genealogies and birth narratives are too absent from Mark and John.^[11]

Cultural context [edit]

Matthew one:18 says that Mary was betrothed (engaged) to Joseph.^[13] Under Jewish constabulary betrothal was only possible for minors, which for girls meant anile under twelve or prior to the starting time mense, whichever came start.^[thirteen] We can thus take it that Mary was twelve years old or a fiddling less, at the fourth dimension of the events described in the gospels^[xiv] Co-ordinate to custom the hymeneals would take place twelve months later, after which the groom would take his bride from her father's house to his ain.^[14] A betrothed girl who had sexual activity with a human other than her husband-to-be was considered an adulteress.^[xiv] If tried earlier a tribunal both she and the boyfriend would be stoned to death, but it was possible for her betrothed husband to issue a certificate of repudiation, and this, according to Matthew, was the class Joseph wished to take prior to the visitation by the angel.^[15]

The well-nigh likely cultural context for both Matthew and Luke is Jewish Christian or mixed Gentile/Jewish-Christian circles in rooted in Jewish tradition.^[16] These readers would take known that the Roman Senate had declared Julius Caesar a god and his successor Augustus to be divi filius, the Son of God earlier he became a god himself on his decease in AD xiv; this remained the design for later emperors.^[17] Imperial divinity was accompanied past suitable miraculous birth stories, with Augustus existence fathered by the god Apollo while his man mother slept, and her human being husband beingness granted a dream in which he saw the sunday rise from her womb, and inscriptions even described the news of the divine majestic birth as evangelia, the gospel.^[18] The virgin birth of Jesus was thus a direct claiming to a central merits of Roman imperial theology, namely the divine formulation and descent of the emperors.^[19]

Matthew's genealogy, tracing Jesus's Davidic descent, was intended for Jews, while his virgin birth story was intended for a Greco-Roman audience familiar with virgin birth stories and stories of women impregnated by gods.^[twenty] The aboriginal world had no understanding that male semen and female ovum were both needed to form a fetus,^[21] making a cultural milieu conducive to miraculous birth stories.^[22] Such stories are less frequent in Judaism, but in that location too at that place was a widespread belief in angels and divine intervention in births.^[23] Theologically, the two accounts marking the moment when Jesus becomes the Son of God, i.due east., at his nativity, in stardom to Marker, for whom the Sonship dates from Jesus's baptism,^{[Mark 1:9–xiii]} and Paul and the pre-Pauline Christians for whom Jesus becomes the Son only at the Resurrection or fifty-fifty the 2d Coming.^[24]

The ancient world had no agreement that male person semen and female ovum were both needed to form a fetus; instead they thought that the male person contribution in reproduction consisted of some sort of determinative or generative principle, while Mary's actual fluids would provide all the thing that was needed for Jesus's bodily grade, including his male sexual practice.^[25] This cultural milieu was conducive to miraculous nascency stories – they were common in biblical tradition going back to Abraham and Sarah (and the formulation of Isaac).^[22]

Tales of virgin nativity and the impregnation of mortal women past deities were well known in the 1st-century Greco-Roman world,^[26] and 2d Temple Jewish works were also capable of producing accounts of the appearances of angels and miraculous births for ancient heroes such equally Melchizedek, Noah, and Moses.^[23] Luke's virgin birth story is a standard plot from the Jewish scriptures, equally for instance in the announcement scenes for Isaac and for Samson, in which an angel appears and causes anticipation, the angel gives reassurance and announces the coming nascence, the female parent raises an objection, and the angel gives a sign.^[27] However, "plausible sources that tell of virgin birth in areas assuredly close to the gospels' ain probable origins have proven extremely hard to demonstrate".^[28] Similarly, while it is widely accustomed that there is a connection with Zoroastrian (Persian) sources underlying Matthew's story of the Magi (the wise men from the East) and the Star of Bethlehem, a wider claim that Zoroastrianism formed the background to the infancy narratives has non achieved credence.^[28]

Historicity and sources of the narratives [edit]

The modern scholarly consensus is that the doctrine of the virgin birth rests on very slender historical foundations.^[3] Both Matthew and Luke are late and anonymous compositions dating from the flow AD eighty–100.^[29] The earliest Christian writings, the Pauline epistles, do not incorporate any mention of a virgin nativity and presume Jesus'south full humanity, stating that he was "born of a woman" similar any other human being and "born under the constabulary" similar any Jew.^[30] The Gospel of Marking, dating from around Advert 70, nosotros read of Jesus saying that "prophets are not without honour, except in their abode boondocks, and among their ain kin, and in their ain business firm" – Mark 6:4), which suggests that Mark was not enlightened of any tradition of special circumstances surrounding Jesus' nascency, and while the author of the gospel of John is confident that Jesus is more than human he makes no reference to a virgin birth to testify his point.^[31] John in fact refers twice to Jesus as the "son of Joseph," the first time from the lips of the disciple Philip ("Nosotros accept found him about whom Moses in the police and likewise the prophets wrote, Jesus, son of Joseph from Nazareth" – John 1:45), the 2nd from the unbelieving Jews ("Is this non Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose mother and male parent we know?" – John vi:41).^[32] These quotations, incidentally, are in direct opposition to the suggestion that Jesus was, or was believed to be, illegitimate: Philip and the Jews know that Jesus had a human father, and that father was Joseph.^[33]

This raises the question of where the authors of Matthew and Luke found their stories. It is almost certain that neither was the work of an eyewitness.^[34] ^[35] In view of the many inconsistencies betwixt them neither is probable to derive from the other, nor did they share a common source.^[2] Raymond E. Brown suggested in 1973 that Joseph was the source of Matthew's account and Mary of Luke's, but modern scholars consider this "highly unlikely" given that the stories emerged so late.^[36] It follows that the two narratives were created by the two writers, drawing on ideas in apportionment at least a decade earlier the gospels were equanimous, to perchance 65-75 or fifty-fifty before.^[37]

Matthew presents the ministry of Jesus as largely the fulfilment of prophecies from the Book of Isaiah,^[38] and Matthew 1:22-23, "All this took place to fulfil what had been spoken by the Lord through the prophet: "Expect, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son...", is a reference to Isaiah 7:xiv, "...the Lord himself shall requite you lot a sign: the maiden is with child and she volition bear a son..."^[39] ^[40] But in the time of Jesus the Jews of Palestine no longer spoke Hebrew, Isaiah was translated into Greek,^[38] and Matthew uses the Greek word parthenos, which does mean virgin, for the Hebrew almah, which scholars hold signifies a girl of childbearing age without reference to virginity.^[39] ^[40] This mistranslation gave the author of Matthew the opportunity to interpret Jesus as the prophesied Immanuel, God is with us, the divine representative on globe.^[twoscore]

Theology and development [edit]

Matthew and Luke use the virgin birth (or more accurately the divine formulation that precedes information technology) to mark the moment when Jesus becomes the Son of God.^[24] This was a notable development over Marking, for whom the Sonship dates from Jesus's baptism, Mark 1:9–thirteen and the earlier Christianity of Paul and the pre-Pauline Christians for whom Jesus becomes the Son at the Resurrection or fifty-fifty the Second Coming.^[24] The Ebionites, a Jewish Christian sect, saw Jesus as fully human, rejected the virgin nascence, and preferred to translate almah as "immature adult female".^[41] The 2nd century gnostic theologian Marcion likewise rejected the virgin birth, merely regarded Jesus as descended fully formed from sky and having simply the appearance of humanity.^[42] By nigh Advert 180 Jews were telling how Jesus had been illegitimately conceived by a Roman soldier named Pantera or Pandera, whose name is likely a pun on parthenos, virgin.^[43] The story was nonetheless current in the Middle Ages in satirical parody of the Christian gospels chosen the Toledot Yeshu.^[44] ^[45] The Toledot Yeshu contains no historical facts, and was probably created as a tool for warding off conversions to Christianity.^[44]

The virgin birth was after accustomed by Christians as the proof of the divinity of Jesus, but its rebuttal during and later on the 18th century European Enlightenment led some to redefine information technology as mythical, while others reaffirmed information technology in dogmatic terms.^[46] This division remains in place, although some national synods of the Catholic Church building have replaced a biological understanding with the thought of "theological truth", and some evangelical theologians hold it to be marginal rather than indispensable to the Christian faith.^[46]

Celebrations and devotions [edit]

Christians celebrate the formulation of Jesus on 25 March and his nativity on 25 December.^[47] (These dates are traditional; no one knows for certain when Jesus was born.) The Magnificat, based on Luke 1:46-55 is ane of four well known Gospel canticles: the Benedictus and the Magnificat in the outset chapter, and the Gloria in Excelsis and the Nunc dimittis in the second chapter of Luke, which are now an integral function of the Christian liturgical tradition.^[48] The Annunciation became an element of Marian devotions in medieval times, and by the 13th century direct references to it were widespread in French lyrics.^[49] The Eastern Orthodox Church uses the title "Ever Virgin Mary" as a key chemical element of its Marian veneration, and equally function of the Akathists hymns to Mary which are an integral part of its liturgy.^[fifty]

The doctrine is often represented in Christian fine art in terms of the annunciation to Mary by the Archangel Gabriel that she would conceive a child to be born the Son of God, and in Nativity scenes that include the figure of Salome. The Annunciation is one of the nigh oft depicted scenes in Western fine art.^[51] Announcement scenes besides amount to the most frequent appearances of Gabriel in medieval art.^[52] The depiction of Joseph turning away in some Nascence scenes is a discreet reference to the fatherhood of the Holy Spirit, and the virgin nativity.^[53]

In Islam [edit]

The Quran acknowledges the virgin nascence of Jesus.^[54] In surah 19 (Surah Maryam), the virgin Mary conceives and gives birth to Jesus, and when her people slander her, Mary does not answer except past pointing to her newborn son, Jesus, who defends his female parent by miraculously speaking.^[55] The Islamic view holds that Jesus was God's discussion which he directed to Mary and a spirit created by him, moreover Jesus was supported past the Holy Spirit.^[56] The Quran follows the counterfeit gospels, and especially in the Protoevangelium of James, in their accounts of the miraculous births of both Mary and her son Jesus.^[57] Surah 3:35–36, for example, follows the Protoevangelium closely when describing how the pregnant "married woman of Imran" (that is, Mary'southward mother Anna) dedicates her unborn child to God, Mary'south secluded upbringing within the Temple, and the angels who bring her food.^[58]

Gallery [edit]

Eastern Orthodox Nascence delineation picayune changed in more than than a millennium
Giotto (1267–1337): Nativity with an uninvolved Joseph only without Salome
Medieval miniature of the Birth, c. 1350

See besides [edit]

Adoptionism
Almah
Christology
Denial of the virgin birth of Jesus
Immaculate Conception of Mary
Incarnation (Christianity)
Isaiah 7:14
Perpetual virginity of Mary
Parthenogenesis

References [edit]

Citations [edit]

^ ^a ^b Carrigan 2000, p. 1359.
^ ^a ^b ^c Hurtado 2005, p. 318.
^ ^a ^b Bruner 2004, p. 37.
^ Ware 1993, p. unpaginated.
^ Barclay 1998, p. 55.
^ ^a ^b Robinson 2009, p. 111.
^ Lincoln 2013, p. 99.
^ Morris 1992, p. 31–32.
^ Carroll 2012, p. 39.
^ Zervos 2019, p. 78.
^ ^a ^b BeDuhn 2015, p. 170.
^ Dunn 2003, p. 341-343.
^ ^a ^b Vermes 2006a, p. 216.
^ ^a ^b ^c Vermes 2006b, p. 72.
^ Vermes 2006b, p. 73.
^ Hurtado 2005, p. 328.
^ Hornblower & Spawforth 2014, p. 688. sfn error: no target: CITEREFHornblowerSpawforth2014 (aid)
^ Borg 2011, p. 41-42.
^ Borg 2011, p. 41.
^ Lachs 1987, p. 5-half-dozen.
^ Lincoln 2013, p. 196.
^ ^a ^b Schowalter 1993, p. 790.
^ ^a ^b Casey 1991, p. 152.
^ ^a ^b ^c Loewe 1996, p. 184.
^ Lincoln 2013, p. 195–196, 258.
^ Lachs 1987, p. half-dozen.
^ Kodell 1992, p. 939.
^ ^a ^b Welburn 2008, p. two.
^ Fredriksen 2008, p. seven.
^ Lincoln 2013, p. 21.
^ Lincoln 2013, p. 23.
^ Lincoln 2013, p. 24.
^ Lincoln 2013, p. 29.
^ Dull & Craddock 2009, p. 12.
^ Reddish 2011, p. 13.
^ Lincoln 2013, p. 144.
^ Hurtado 2005, p. 318–319, 325.
^ ^a ^b Barker 2001, p. 490.
^ ^a ^b Sweeney 1996, p. 161.
^ ^a ^b ^c Saldarini 2001, p. 1007.
^ Paget 2010, p. 351.
^ Hayes 2017, p. 152 fn.153.
^ Voorst 2000, p. 117.
^ ^a ^b Melt 2011, p. unpaginated.
^ Evans 1998, p. 450.
^ ^a ^b Kärkkäinen 2009, p. 175.
^ Nothaft 2014, p. 564.
^ Simpler 1990, p. 396.
^ O'Sullivan 2005, p. fourteen–15.
^ Peltomaa 2001, p. 127.
^ Guiley 2004, p. 183.
^ Ross 1996, p. 99.
^ Grabar 1968, p. 130.
^ Hulmes 1993, p. 640.
^ Zebiri 2000.
^ Saritoprak 2014, pp. 3, 6.
^ Bong 2012, p. 110.
^ Reynolds 2018, p. 55–56.

Bibliography [edit]

Akyol, Mustafa (2017). The Islamic Jesus. St. Martin's Publishing Group. ISBN9781250088703.
Barclay, William (1998). The Apostles' Creed. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN9781250088703.

Barker, Margaret (2001). "Isaiah". In Dunn, James D.G.; Rogerson, John (eds.). Eerdmans Commentary on the Bible. Eerdmans. ISBN9780802837110.

BeDuhn, Jason (2015). "The New Marcion" (PDF). Forum. iii (Autumn 2015): 163–179.
Bell, Richard (2012). The Origin of Islam in Its Christian Environment. Routledge. ISBN9781136260674.
Borg, Marcus (2011). Jesus. SPCK.
Brown, Raymond E. (1973). The Virginal Conception and Bodily Resurrection of Jesus. Paulist Press. ISBN978-0809117680.
Chocolate-brown, Raymond E. (1999). The Birth of the Messiah: A Commentary on the Infancy Narratives in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke. Yale University Press. ISBN978-0300140088.
Boring, 1000. Eugene; Craddock, Fred B. (2009). The People's New Testament Commentary. Westminster John Knox. ISBN9780664235925.
Bruner, Frederick (2004). Matthew 1-12. Eerdmans. ISBN9780802811189.
Carrigan, Henry L. (2000), "Virgin Birth", in Freedman, David Noel; Myers, Allen C. (eds.), Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible, Eerdmans, ISBN9789053565032
Carroll, John T. (2000). "Eschatology". In Freedman, David Noel; Myers, Allen C. (eds.). Eerdmans Dictionary of the Bible. Eerdmans. ISBN9789053565032.
Carroll, John T. (2012). Luke: A Commentary. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN978-0664221065.
Casey, Maurice (1991). From Jewish Prophet to Gentile God: The Origins and Development of New Testament Christology. Westminster John Knox Printing. ISBN9780664227654.
Childs, Brevard Due south (2001). Isaiah. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN978-0664221430.
Chouinard, Larry (1997), Matthew, College Printing, ISBN978-0899006284
Collinge, William J. (2012). Historical Dictionary of Catholicism. Scarecrow Printing. ISBN9780810879799.
Coyle, Kathleen (1996), Mary in the Christian Tradition (revised ed.), Gracewing Publishing, ISBN978-0852443804
Cook, Michael J. (2011), "Jewish Perspectives on Jesus", in Burkett, Delbert (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Jesus, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN9781444351750
Davidson, John (2005). The Gospel Of Jesus: In Search Of His Original Teachings. Clear Printing. ISBN978-1904555148.
Deiss, Lucien (1996). Joseph, Mary, Jesus. Liturgical Press. ISBN978-0814622551.
Dorman, T.M. (1995). "Virgin Nativity". In Bromiley, Geoffrey Westward. (ed.). International Standard Bible Encyclopedia: Q-Z. Eerdmans. ISBN978-0802837844.
Dunn, James D.Thousand. (2003). Jesus Remembered: Christianity in the Making, Volume 1. Eerdmans.
Erskine, Andrew (2009). A Companion to the Hellenistic World. John Wiley & Sons.
Evans, Craig (1998), "Jesus in non-Christian Sources", in Chilton, Bruce; Evans, Craig (eds.), Studying the Historical Jesus: Evaluations of the Country of Current Inquiry, BRILL, ISBN9004111425
France, R.T. (2007). The Gospel of Matthew. Eerdmans. ISBN978-0802825018.
Fredriksen, Paula (2008). From Jesus to Christ: The Origins of the New Testament Images of Jesus. Yale Academy Press. ISBN978-0300164107.
Grabar, André (1968). Christian Iconography: A Study of Its Origins. Princeton University Press. ISBN9780710062376.
Gregg, D. Larry (2000). "Docetism". In Freedman, David Noel; Myers, Allen C. (eds.). Eerdmans Lexicon of the Bible. Eerdmans. ISBN9789053565032.
Guiley, Rosemary (2004). The Encyclopedia of Angels. New York: Facts on File. ISBN0-8160-5023-half-dozen.
Hayes, Andrew (2017). Justin against Marcion: Defining the Christian Philosophy. Fortress Press.
Hendrickson, Peter A.; Jenson, Bradley C.; Lundell, Randi H. (2015). Luther and Bach on the Magnificat. Wipf and Stock. ISBN9781625641205.
Hornblower, Simon; Spawnforth, Antony (2014). The Oxford Companion to Classical Culture. Oxford University Press.
Hulmes, Edward (1993), "Quran and the Bible, The", in Metzger, Bruce M.; Coogan, Michael David (eds.), The Oxford Companion to the Bible, Oxford University Press, ISBN978-0-19-974391-ix
Hurtado, Larry (2005). Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity. Eerdmans. ISBN9780802831675.
Kärkkäinen, 5.-N (2009), "Christology", in Dyrness, William A.; Kärkkäinen, Veli-Matti (eds.), Global Lexicon of Theology, InterVarsity Press, ISBN9780830878116
Kodell, Jerome (1992). "Luke". In Karris, Robert J. (ed.). The Collegeville Bible Commentary: New Testament, NAB. Liturgical Printing. ISBN978-0814622117.
Koester, Helmut (2000). Introduction to the New Testament: History and literature of early Christianity. Vol. 2. Walter de Gruyter. ISBN9783110149708.
Kugler, Robert; Hartin, Patrick (2009). An Introduction to the Bible. Eerdmans. ISBN9780802846365.
Lachs, Samuel T. (1987). A Rabbinic Commentary of the New Testament: the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke. KTAV Publishing House. ISBN978-0881250893.
Lincoln, Andrew (2013). Built-in of a Virgin?. Eerdmans. ISBN978-0802869258.
Loewe, William P. (1996). The College Student'south Introduction to Christology. Liturgical Press. ISBN9780814650189.
Marsh, Clive; Moyise, Steve (2006). Jesus and the Gospels. A&C Black. ISBN978-0567040732.
Marthaler, Berard Fifty. (2007). The Creed: The Apostolic Faith in Gimmicky Theology. Xx-Third Publications. ISBN9780896225374.
McGuckin, John Anthony (2004). The Westminster Handbook to Patristic Theology. Westminster John Knox Printing.
Miller, John W. (2008). "The Miracle of Christ's Birth". In Ellens, J. Harold (ed.). Miracles. ABC-CLIO. ISBN978-0275997236.
Morris, Leon (1992). The Gospel According to Matthew. Eerdmans. ISBN978-0851113388.
Nothaft, C. Philipp E. (2014). Medieval Latin Christian Texts on the Jewish Calendar: A Study with Five Editions and Translations. Leiden: Brill. ISBN9789004274129.
O'Sullivan, Daniel E. (2005). Marian devotion in thirteenth-century French lyric. University of Toronto Press. ISBN0802038859.
Paget, James Carleton (2010). Jews, Christians and Jewish Christians in Antiquity. Mohr Siebeck. ISBN9783161503122.
Crimson, Mitchell (2011). An Introduction to The Gospels. Abingdon Press. ISBN9781426750083.
Peltomaa, Leena Mari (2001). The image of the Virgin Mary in the Akathistos hymn. Brill. ISBN9004120882.
Reynolds, Gabriel Said (2018). The Qur'an and the Bible: Text and Commentary. Yale University Printing. ISBN9780300181326.
Robinson, Bernard P. (2009). "Matthew'due south Nativity Stories". In Corley, Jeremy (ed.). New Perspectives on the Nativity. Bloomsbury. ISBN9780567613790.
Ross, Leslie (1996). Medieval Fine art: A Topical Lexicon. Greenwood Press. ISBN9780313293290.

Saldarini, Anthony J. (2001). "Matthew". In Dunn, James D.Thousand.; Rogerson, John (eds.). Eerdmans Commentary on the Bible. Eerdmans. ISBN9780802837110.

Saritoprak, Zeki (2014). Islam's Jesus. Tampa: University Press of Florida. ISBN978-0-8130-4940-3.
Satlow, Michael Fifty. (2018). Jewish Spousal relationship in Antiquity. Princeton University Press.
Sawyer, W. Thomas (1990). "Mary". In Mills, Watson East.; Bullard, Roger Aubrey (eds.). Mercer Lexicon of the Bible. Mercer University Press. ISBN978-0865543737.
Schowalter, Daniel N. (1993). "Virgin Nascence of Christ". In Metzger, B.M.; Coogan, D. (eds.). The Oxford Companion to the Bible. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN9780199743919.
Simpler, Steven (1990). "Hymn". In Mills, Watson East.; Bullard, Roger Aubrey (eds.). Mercer Dictionary of the Bible. Mercer University Press. ISBN9780865543737.
Sweeney, Marvin A (1996). Isaiah 1–39: with an introduction to prophetic literature. Eerdmans. ISBN978-0802841001.
Turner, David Fifty. (2008). Matthew. Baker. ISBN978-0-8010-2684-three.
Tyson, Joseph B. (2006). Marcion and Luke-Acts: A Defining Struggle. University of South Carolina Press. ISBN9781570036507.
Vermes, Geza (2006a). Who's Who in the Age of Jesus. Penguin UK.
Vermes, Geza (2006b). The Nativity: History and Legend. Penguin UK.
Voorst, Robert van (2000). Jesus Exterior the New Testament. Eerdmans. ISBN9780802843685.
Wahlde, Urban von (2015). Gnosticism, Docetism, and the Judaisms of the First Century. Bloomsbury. ISBN9780567656599.
Ware, Timothy (1993). The Orthodox Church building: An Introduction to Eastern Christianity. Penguin. ISBN9780141925004.
Weaver, Rebeccah H. (2008), "Jesus in early Christianity", in Benedetto, Robert; Knuckles, James O (eds.), The New Westminster Dictionary of Church History: The early, medieval, and Reformation eras, Westminster John Knox Press, ISBN978-0664224165
Welburn, Andrew J. (2008). From a Virgin Womb: The "Apocalypse of Adam" and the Virgin Nativity. BRILL. ISBN9789004163768.
Wilson, Frank E. (1989). Organized religion and Practice. Harrisburg, PA: Church Publishing, Inc. ISBN9780819224576.
Zebiri, Kate (March 2000). "Contemporary Muslim Understanding of the Miracles of Jesus". The Muslim Globe. xc (1–2): 71–90. doi:10.1111/j.1478-1913.2000.tb03682.x.
Zervos, George (2019). The Protevangelium of James. Bloomsbury Academic. p. 79.

cesarwhoint48.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_birth_of_Jesus